Posted on Jun 21
Kansas Governor signs legislation to lure Chiefs and Royals with new stadiums, sparking controversy: "The Chiefs and the Royals are pretty much using us.
u/alex •
KANSAS CITY, MO - A fierce battle has erupted between the states of Kansas and Missouri over the future of the Kansas City Chiefs and the Kansas City Royals. With talks of new stadiums and potential relocation, tensions are high as both sides vie for the opportunity to host these beloved sports teams. As economic factors and political maneuvering come into play, the fate of these franchises hangs in the balance.
In a bold move to lure the Chiefs and Royals away from Missouri, Kansas Governor Laura Kelly recently signed legislation that would assist in funding new stadiums. The measure allows bonds to cover 70% of the cost of each proposed stadium, with Kansas having 30 years to pay them off. Revenues from sports betting, state lottery ticket sales, and new sales and alcohol taxes generated in the surrounding area would be used to pay off these bonds.
The Kansas-Missouri border splits the Kansas City area, with approximately 60% of the population residing on the Missouri side. This geographical division adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing debate. While Kansas is making efforts to entice the teams across the state line, Missouri officials argue that discussions about building new stadiums are still in the early stages. Moreover, the lease on the existing complex does not expire until January 2031.
The Royals had unveiled plans to construct a state-of-the-art ballpark in downtown Kansas City, Missouri, with an estimated cost exceeding $2 billion. Meanwhile, the Chiefs were considering an $800 million renovation of their existing home. These ambitious proposals have sparked controversy and criticism, with some suggesting that the teams are seeking the largest government subsidies possible and pitting the two states against each other.
State Representative Susan Ruiz of Kansas expressed her concerns, stating, "The Chiefs and the Royals are pretty much using us." The sentiment reflects the growing political backlash against the teams' attempts to secure favorable deals. Kansas City, Missouri Mayor Quinton Lucas also weighed in, remarking, "It's fairly clearly about how you poach."
Economists have voiced skepticism regarding the financial sense of a move for either team or a new host city. Relocation can be a costly endeavor, and approval from a supermajority of owners is required by both the NFL and MLB for franchise moves. As the debate intensifies, the economic viability and long-term impact of such a decision remain under scrutiny.
The battle for the Chiefs and Royals has intensified as Kansas and Missouri lock horns in a high-stakes competition. With ambitious plans for new stadiums and the promise of economic benefits, both states are determined to secure the future of these iconic sports franchises. However, challenges lie ahead, including political maneuvering, financial considerations, and the requirement of league approval. As the saga unfolds, fans and stakeholders anxiously await the outcome that will shape the future of Kansas City's sports landscape.